My mother-in-law Liz passed a long a link to The Hunger Site, a web site where visitors can click a button once a day and have food donated to the poor. I'd say clicking a link is the least one could do to combat hunger, but then again there's always the option of doing nothing, and that's obviously worse.
Still, I've recently done a lot of pondering of the notion of wealthsomething to which the issues of hunger and poverty are inextricably linkedand I'm convinced that the best thing we can do is to help other nations become more capitalist and more democratic. That doesn't mean we should abandon our obligation to specific people in need. I just don't think that the long-term solution to wide-spread hunger or poverty will happen at a local level.
[I'm reminded here of the story of the man walking down the beach throwing starfish back into the ocean so they wouldn't die. He's approached by another man who asks why he's wasting his time. "There are thousands of starfish here. You'll never make that much of a difference," the second man says. "Made a difference to that one," says the first man as he throws a starfish back into the water and continues down the beach.]
Most of the wealth of the world is tied up in the United States and its citizens, and God knows it's not because we're smarter than everybody else. But it may have been because our Founding Fathers were smarter than everybody else. Capitalism, the idea that people should have the economic freedom to use their time, tools, and talents to get ahead in life, and democracy, that the citizenry has the freedom and the right to govern itself, are twin shining ideals which have made the United States the political and economic envy of the world.
Such is the magic of our system that even stupid people can be rich (and frequently are) and that much of our underclass enjoys a high standard of living relatively to what constitutes poverty throughout history. Make no mistake: For all its numerous faults, the US economic and political system is the most successful the world has ever seen, and the best thing we can do to fight hunger and poverty throughout the world is to export these ideals.
In a related vein, one thing that we can say about the war in Afganistan is that unless it is followed by a re-construction of the country, the war will be a failure. In a larger sense, the military does not win wars, it just makes it possible for peace to happen. What wins wars, and that is to say the hearts and minds of those defeated militarily, is the economic aid that follows. Hitler rose to power after the Treaty of Versaille attempted to squash Germany like a bug with punitive economic terms. World War II was the result. I'm convinced that the Marshall Plan and the US reconstruction of Japan following World War II is what saved us from World War III. (It also led Germany and Japan to be economic powerhouses of their regions of the world.)
I've posted my thoughts on understanding wealth in our society in my latest Opinion piece called Winning the American Game.